I'm sorry I didn't see your response sooner.

Central banks don't create "money" as that is reserved for Congress as the monopoly issuer of our currency. They can only create deposits that are balanced by private sector debt to enable interbank transfers. If Congress doesn't create sufficient currency to retire that debt in a timely manner, as we saw from Clinton's "surplus" budgets, the system fails rather quickly.

Money is not a "thing" that is finite and tangible. It is a unit of measure that allows resources to be deployed in the economy. I like to use the analogy of inches and feet in relation to construction. One would not expect an engineer to ever halt plans to build a bridge because he ran out of inches or feet needed to complete his plan if all necessary real resources were available.

A realistic view of our currency would show it similarly ridiculous to withhold program spending beneficial to our society solely for a lack of "money" when the people holding the purse strings create the money on demand. It also becomes evident that demanding that currency be "extracted/destroyed" to match such spending is nothing more than theft by fraud that fails to leave any store of value from our commerce.

I'm not a fan of QE as it is practiced by the Fed, but the vast distance between currently accepted econ myths and the econ reality of our monetary system has allowed it as the only politically available method to manage the economy given the econ ignorance/corruption of Congress.