Sometimes the worst thing we can do is attempt to "pay for" legislation that forwards society and serves the public purpose. This is because taxes remove currency from the private sector but don't actually pay for anything. Ditto with borrowing.

This isn't to say we can just keep creating new money without extracting some of it back, or that we wouldn't be better off if some people had less money. I'm simply saying that it is often better to leave money in circulation if it is accomplishing anything other than giving bragging rights to the already immensely wealthy.

Every dollar of deficit spending becomes someone's monetary asset in the private sector. It's not ideology, just maths. If the dollars spent arrive low enough on the ladder to create opportunity for a class that hasn't seen any for a while then it doesn't need to be "paid for". The federal government, as the monopoly issuer of US dollars, doesn't function like a household and trying to force it to do so is killing the American dream.