You point out that all powers not specified as belonging to the federal government are relegated to the states. But then you go on to bitch about laws that are imposed by the states and, I believe, purposefully drum up opposition to the federal government by conflating those.

The US Constitution is very clear about the federal government's authority to issue money and lay taxes "for the general welfare", including setting requirements for states receiving federal funding. It also gives the federal government authority to regulate interstate and international commerce.

Which is it that you oppose? Or are you just a malcontent that opposes society in general?